Reader Response Responding: Adam's Heat Transfer Theory

"Anonymous said...

heaticles and coldicles interesting theory laddie, but a hink ur talking utter pash obviously hot is hot and cold is feckin cold so there ya fanny next time ye blabber such nonsense i'll be round tae gee ye the malky

November 11, 2007 3:04 AM"

Well, far from the support I expected from the dissemination of my new and exciting theory I created, Adam's Heat Transfer Theory, I recieved a message of deep personal rancour and disbelief; not to mention what I can only guess is a threat to inflict bodily harm upon me.

I do not wish to lower myself to such reprobationary words and threats, I will feel sorry for and pity our Dear Reader, whom, comfortable in his last bastion of inscience lashes out at the progress of science and humanity. My attempts to raise humankind past itself, to save itself from aimlessly wandering in the depths of superstition and irrationality is sometimes met with fear and misunderstanding or reactionary invectives.

Yes, Dear Reader, hot IS hot, and cold IS cold, but past your superficial understanding of the physical world, is another deeper world metaphysical in size and scope which needs to be understood before mental progress can begin. Lift yourself past these barriers of smug relative reasoning and you will find a grand world of knowledge and understanding shining bright on the shadows of your own misunderstanding!

From time to time I receive these kinds of hurtful words. I am becoming rather used to it since I began blogging. I say "cold and heat is the interplay between heaticles and coldicles" and in reply "thats utter nonsense, and if you repeat that again I will beat you about your head"; so like all revolutionary free-thinkers I must suffer for the truth and in defense of my views. As an ethical and moral creature and a patron of science and knowledge, this is the only way.

I pray for you Dear Sir or Madam.